This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
So many of the articles cover the same ground, either breathlessly celebrating AI’s promise or bemoaning the brave new world on the horizon. This article from Dr. Mendoza made me feel embarrassed that I have not even considered this angle. I’ve already gotten pretty bored reading about AI in medicine.
On the other, articles will sometimes find second life on the site. 1 Being alerted to this article was a gift for several reasons. The article itself also got me thinking. Initially, I was tempted to dismiss it as one of those “back in the good old days” screeds until I realized the article was published in 1998.
Doctors see patients in rushed 15-minute appointments, often without a cursory physicalexam. In an article titled, “ Can Hospitality Cure the Woes of Healthcare?” Losing Touch In far too many provider-patient encounters, the art of communication is lost, seemingly forgotten in the rush of things to do.
Amwell also began allying with TytoCare this week, to enable home-based physicalexams using med-tech designed for patients’ at-home use. For example, AmWell began collaborating with the Google cloud business, where the company invested $100 million to scale the alliance.
In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of telehealth, providing a balanced perspective on its impact on healthcare delivery. Limited Physical Examinations One of the primary drawbacks of telehealth is that it limits the ability of providers to conduct thorough physical examinations. Pros of Telehealth 1.
This article will explore scoliosis in-depth, focusing on its detection, treatment options, surgeries, and how to cope with the condition. Many people find out they have the condition following an unrelated physicalexam or by visiting their doctor after experiencing back pain. Who Can Develop Scoliosis?
No article or textbook or AI bot will give “the answer.” On his physicalexam, the new internist hears a loud mitral regurgitation (MR) murmur. Frustration is common, especially when their doctors disagree about the best way forward. For doctors, these “cases” are humbling.
This article, and the accompanying podcast , has stimulated more conversation than a “non-research” article has in years. If you haven’t read the article, please do. Sensible Medicine is thrilled to be able to feature some articles reacting to, and expanding on, Dr. Rosenbaum’s work in the coming weeks.
Interacting with patients Medical students start by learning to take a complete patient history and review of systems, then progress to the physicalexam. Most medical schools give first-year students an opportunity to begin seeing patients and learning the basics of the medical history and physicalexam.
A 2006 New Zealand article estimated that “assuming a causal association between smoking and SIDS,” 1/3 of SIDS deaths could have been prevented if their mothers hadn’t smoked. A 2010 American article estimates 23-34% of SIDS deaths are due to smoking. They then analyzed the deaths that occurred over the first year.
was a special communication article published by JAMA Psychiatry. The Biden administration proposed making it a Schedule III drug, with a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence. Rescheduling Cannabis — Medicine or Politics?” Authors Bertha K. Madras, PhD, and Paul J.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content